User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2014/February

Hum 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hum 2. Since you had some involvement with the Hum 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UBStalk 01:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

JS Group

The page of JG Group is full of personal attacks. land Grabbing Case was against owner, not its group. so it must not be shared at JS Group page. Allegations of Sunday leader was fake as no reports of SECP are found or lodged. Finally, Sprint Energy is not owned by JS Group, it has shares in it. Bonus to Ali siddiqui is nothing to do with company operations. So kindly tell me how these information can be removed from page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creative factor (talk • contribs) 09:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

@Creative factor Let me take a look at it and then I will get back to you probably in a day or two. -- SMS ^Talk 10:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	The Commons Barnstar
	This barnstar is given to Smsarmad. Thanks for contributing Kashmir Solidarity Day. Hadiyamind (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the warning

Thank you, I have responded to you on my talkpage. AcidSnow (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Just read your message and after reading i fully understands your concerns, as you are a senior member so you know much better than me about your wikipedia, i am new user so all what i have done is mistake or no proper guidance. i hope you understand this matter and from now i will fully co operate with you. Thankyou for information --usmanaslam (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Smsarmad, I have left a response at Khabboos talkpage. AcidSnow (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Wali Khan Babar

Hi there, I'm mentioning this to you because I noticed you had edited Wali Khan Babar a couple of times removing vandalism. A couple of sentences there made no sense to me, so I looked through the history to see if something had been removed. The article was full of vandalism edits which had been fixed and reverted back to a last good version. However, I found a couple of IP edits that appear to be vandalism, but were not fixed in cleanup. These edits removed sources and butchered a sentence by removing random words and letters, some of which were still visible in the article. I was just wondering if you could take a look at the article and see if the content I re-added was actually supposed to be there?[1]. If it's not supposed to be there, I'll probably be accused of vandalism, which wasn't my intention and would like to be able to remove the text before that happens. Thanks in advance. Cmr08 (talk) 06:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing it at the expense of considerable time that it takes. It surely is not vandalism and is verified from the inline sources that I find reliable. -- SMS ^Talk 21:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Stop Creating Useless Articles

We have noticed that you are in habbit of creating small useless articles, just for the sake of creation. articles like F-7 F-8 Melody Market Kohsar market etc etc. These small articles wont make you scholar. Please stop doing so. You may keep awarding Barnstar to yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.9.141 (talk) 05:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Best of luck with digging into my contributions. If I was fond of barnstars I would have displayed it on my userpage, the one you gave me when I filed a SPI report on Bhural, with whom you had, in fact have a number of content disputes. -- SMS ^Talk 21:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Does not pass GNG, I would not have created that. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

All of them or are you referring to anyone specific? Actually they all are geographical places, which are mostly considered notable if their existence can be verified. But anyhow I will be working to improve them soon. -- SMS ^Talk 21:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Dear IP, this user will not stop creating useless article anyway. You can give him 500 warnings but he will not change his way. Therefore it is useless to talk him. Please ont give attention to it. Thanks - 119.160.119.198 (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Juhi Height

Hi, I made an edit to Juhi Chawla height which you reverted because that did not come from a reliable source. I wonder when her height was mentioned and that too 5 ft. 6 In tall which she definitely is not, you did not change or revert that edit. I'm new on here so the good thing would have been, if you mentioned a good faith revert, secondly I did not know that imbd is not a reliable source. Next time when you revert a newcomer's edit make sure to add good faith thing otherwise with that kind of hostility, wikipedia would die in next two years.

Take this as suggestion and not something personal. Happy editing39.32.123.78 (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Please read the Reliable Source Guideline regarding the source you are talking about. And how can you conclude that I have been watching that article all along when her height was first added? I saw an edit where her height was changed and a source was added, I not only undid it (reason already given in my edit summary) but also removed the unsourced height. -- SMS ^Talk 14:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Alright. As I already said, I'm new on here, there is no need for you to over explain yourself. I just read and saw your contributions. I know how responsibly you have been editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.123.78 (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Reverted

I have reverted your edit on Kohat,It is a great picture. Please don't try to teach wiki rules. Many peoples have shown their concerns and complaints on your talk page, that your edits are unnecessary. Your many articles have been deleted and others are soon going to be proposed for deletion, try to improve them, rather doing useless edits. If you continue like this we would be left with no other option but to contact admins to block you. Bilalsos (talk) 05:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Who is this "We" you speak of? Darkness Shines (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

That picture being great is your opinion and has no value for consideration whether it should be added to an article or not. If you don't want to learn how things work here, I regret to tell you that this place is not for you. About my talk page, it is serving its purpose. And you are most Welcome to report me anywhere to anyone. -- SMS ^Talk 16:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Bilalsos

Have you reported this sock as yet? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, here. And thankfully he is blocked. -- SMS ^Talk 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Yasir Pest

Hello Sms, you are invited here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.118.17 (talk) 07:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)